As far as it goes in direction of Dhammadano, sadly I have to tell you that he is not different to his Moderators and the whole approach given by defilement fondling community of DW.
Rather to try to get rid of them, they even provide each other with reasons to stay simply fools.
Getting rid of the flea or the larvae is the result of anger.
Yes, but it is mitigated by one's wish for the cat's welfare.
WHY FLEAS ARE BAD
There are over 1900 flea species in the world. We are concerned with only one: Ctenocephalides felis, the cat flea. This is the flea that we find on our pets (cats, dogs, rabbits, and other species) in 99.9% of cases and in order to understand how to control the damage caused by this tiny little animal, you should learn all you can about it.
WHAT KIND OF DAMAGE CAN FLEAS CAUSE?
It would be a grave mistake to think of the flea as simply a nuisance. A heavy flea burden is lethal, especially to smaller or younger animals. The cat flea is not at all selective about its host and has been known to kill dairy calves through heavy infestation. Conditions brought about via flea infestation include:
• Flea Allergic Dermatitis
(remember, fleas do not make animals itchy unless there a flea bite allergy)
• Flea Anemia
• Feline Infectious Anemia
(a life-threatening blood parasite carried by fleas)
• Bartonella (cat scratch fever)
(does not make the cat sick but the infected cat can make a person sick)
• Common tapeworm infection
(not harmful but cosmetically unappealing)
REMEMBER THAT MOST PET OWNERS HAVE NO IDEA THAT FLEAS CAN KILL
This is so important that we will say it again: Most pet owners have no idea that fleas can kill. On some level, it is obvious that fleas are blood-sucking insects but most people never put it together in their mind that enough fleas can cause a slow but still life-threatening blood loss. This is especially a problem for elderly cats allowed to go outside. These animals do not groom well and are often debilitated by other diseases. The last thing a geriatric pet needs to worry about is a lethal flea infestation and it is especially important that these animals be well protected.
Also consider that in about 90% of cases where the owner tells us the pet does not have fleas, we find obvious fleas when the animal is flea combed. Despite the TV commercials, the educational pamphlets, the very common nature of the parasite, there are still some very large awareness problems in the public and a multitude of misconceptions.
FLEA MYTHS WE HEAR NEARLY EVERY DAY:
Myth: My pet cannot have fleas because he lives entirely indoors.
Fact: Fleas thrive especially well in the well-regulated temperatures of the home.
Myth: My pet cannot have fleas because if there were any fleas they would be biting (insert name of someone in the family reportedly sensitive to flea bites). Since this person is not being bitten, there must not be any fleas.
Fact: Despite Ctenocephalides felis’ ability to feed of a wide variety of hosts, this flea definitely prefers not to feed on human blood unless absolutely necessary. A newly emerged adult flea is very hungry and may well take a blood meal from the first warm body it finds. An adult flea knocked off its normal host will also be very desperate to find a new host and may feed on the nearest warm body it can find. In general, adult fleas regard human blood as a last choice and humans tend not to be bitten unless flea population numbers are high.
Myth: We do not have fleas because we have only hard wood floors.
Fact: Fleas love to develop in the cracks between the boards of hard wood floors.)
Myth: My pet cannot have fleas because I would see them.
Fact: One cannot expect to see fleas as many animals are especially adept at licking them away. Sometimes all we see is the characteristic skin disease.
http://www.marvistavet.com/html/1_why_fleas_are_bad.html
Not that he tries to make it more relaxed, he even heedless increases anger and reasons that being feel each other as enemies.
100% real useless fool... and you don't need to worry in repeating such, as rebuking those who deserve to be rebuked, not to speak of "disciples" of the Buddha who act in such ways, will bring you in the worst case to heaven.
Since many years Atma, even still not ordained, to bring you together with people of integrity, but there is more then one reason, that one needs to assume the eightfold noble path is no more part of those who call themselves Bhikkhus and seldom within those call themselves disciples of the Buddha ("Buddhists").
If you have a possibility to deliver this and forward the rebuke, you should take on the chance, for it will be for not only your own long time welfare.
And don't worry, such is not sad to "get ride of them for ones preferences" (like the foolish reasoning of war and blood shedding of this fool in robes), but "kick them where they actually dwell" and out to get aware of there useless lane.
Remember pictures of fool and walk around them, when ever you can.
Know this person as somebody who speaks in praise of wrong view, wrong effort, wrong speech (even in the name of Buddha), wrong deeds (you can be sure that such a person is not shy to kill in person by himself), wrong livelihood (fondling communities of defilement by suggesting even wrong livelihood by getting engaged in trade with poison, advertising them even by quality and name) and no doubt, that he will in no way change his foolishness in this Buddha-periode.