Having not really someone perceived who could, would, take care of the Bodhitree, Atma took the orange cloth which the Parisa of Wat Arkyum dedicated last new year to wrap the Buddha image, which has grown dirty and has been left over this year, and wrapped it around the tree in the morning, before alms-round, so that people would get aware of it, surrounded by the wild. Also some neighbors and villagers have been informed about it's existence and grow. Most more then pleased to get aware of it, wishing that he might not get victim in the war of conquer, in the destruction leaded in building streets for machines.
Today morning, as arrived at the street, all trees, young and old, along the old street had been already cut of and no more shadow all along toward south. How ever, the small area around the Bodhi tree still remained untouched till an hour ago.
Also the land, which has fence till today, which Atma used to access to the tiny path upward, has been cleared next the street for about 50m up.
Coming back from alms. two people worked to cut all away on this land. Asking of who they are, if they are the owner of the land. The man said "No". Asked them why they cut the forest here when not being the owner, they told that the owner told them to do so. Asked of who and where the owner is, he pointed to the neighbor north of the land and told that the owner is there to find, that they ordered him to do.
So my person went back to the house of the Brahman who was a follower of the Marxists and scientists, who disregards the monks, Gods and sublime and rejects that there are lower worlds as well. Approaching the house his wife raised up and stand on one side while the Brahman did not rise for his seat and left his feet on the table, asking unpleasing that my person may approach.
My person retold the question and answer-session with the wood cutters, telling them that he told that my person was told that the Brahman and his wife are the owners and now perceiving that this land is no more left over, grasped by the owner, whether it is welcome that my person would cross the land to come and go to the Ashram.
After a for and back that made then clear that he is not the owner and that someone might have informed wrong, my person asked whether he has contact to the owner and he told that the owner is a sibling of him and that my person should not care much and go on to make use. Asking whether it is possible to ask the owner whether it is welcome or not, he said: "No need to care, it's someone else. Go on as before." As it is not proper to make use of what is grasped by others and not joyful given to use by the owner, my person ended the talk with sign that he had heard what he had said and walked on.
Remembering that the owner of the land south of the last land without fence had once given the useof crossing his land, which is done daily after having crossed the free land till the path, my person walked back to Upasaka Chanroths house, asking him whether the owner who had given way last year, has changed his mind or told something that might lead to assume that it is no further welcome. Telling that the owner did not express anything different, my person walked south and approached at the door of the path-owners house. His wife approached my person at the door and my person told her that he was informed last year, that her husband invited to make use of crossing his land to come to the Ashram. Quickly pleased she told that she is well informed, yes, and invited to cross their compound to reach the path.
So my person walked the some 80 meters through the pathless wild of their land next the street, to reach the path up to the Ashram without making use of the land without fence.
As it looks for now, people may not have any given way to come by bike or by motor-cow up to thee foot of the hill. How ever, one may make use to access the path by entering the young neighbors entrance, after having informed him about it and the reason.