It's right, that my person repeatedly joined DW, to make encouragements where no other ways to reach out are found.
Somehow rightly suspected if somebody would say: "He is up to steal, free our slaves! How can he do so?"
Sadhu, Sadhu for care and attentive observing that joining a forum, not personally invited, or by trade or bond to conditions, wouln't be proper to make use as dwelling.
Even taking in trust wouldn't fit. Something long time trying to make aware, as this tradition is marxism, or relays on views of rights.
What does good householder think, would simply joining a forum be fine for somebody not bound to Vinaya? Would a householder, a virtuous one, be remorse-able to take one account?
Two things further to consider, and trusting that thoughts for mention are well meant:
The Kamma of wishing of non-dwelling, non-existing of monks.
The Kamma of wishing to deprive Monks.
Not to speak of wishing to splitt: "Oh, may they be apart so that they wouldn't get known of my faults.
Btw., after getting the first 5 messages intentional approved (good possible by Nyom
Robert K , as the only online yesterday), seemingly welcome, as made by moderator manual, the account has been already deleted, which means that the Kamma of "killing" or depriving is complete.
As for sometimes welcome, sometimes not... as never clear: sometimes suchvthings are welcome, sometimes not, sometimes this "rules" give the dominators even more freedom, as they would not even need to argue before killing and deprive.
* Johann : Visitor, assuming from Thailand, yet "hoping" not one who has gone forth, should how ever, feel being given to make use of visitor-account, feel having been invited and welcome to raise critic, and of course he/she may also feel given to take "own" account or make proper use of what is shared for liberations purpose here on sanghamnet .