Post reply

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Tags:

Seperate each tag by a comma
Message icon:
Attach:
(Clear Attachment)
(more attachments)
Allowed file types: apk, doc, docx, gif, jpg, mpg, pdf, png, txt, zip, xls, 3gpp, mp2, mp3, wav, odt, ods, html, mp4, amr, apk, m4a, jpeg, aac
Restrictions: 50 per post, maximum total size 150000KB, maximum individual size 150000KB
Note that any files attached will not be displayed until approved by a moderator.
Anti-spam: complete the task

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: Dhammañāṇa
« on: October 09, 2019, 05:00:44 PM »

 _/\_  _/\_  _/\_ Okasa

Venerable members of the Sangha,
Bhante Indaññāno , Bhante Nyanadassana , Bhante Varado , Bhante Ariyadhammika

Just this moment this stream of thoughts arose: "There are Venerables who out of wrong perceptions think that it might be better to renounce the training, to disrobe, sometimes because of oldage, sickness, pressure... what ever reason, yet some of those are even Noble ones. Then,thinking on the requirement, my person thought it's not really possible for a Noble One to abound his refuge." So then concluded: "Even if this Venerable would lay own his robes, he still would be a monk, a Bhikkhu."

Did my person perceive that right, or did he miss certain point which derives from the teachings heritage?

It would be good if the Venerables, out of compassion, would comment critical, so that possible doubts could be released.