Post reply

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Tags:

Seperate each tag by a comma
Message icon:

Attach:
(Clear Attachment)
(more attachments)
Allowed file types: apk, doc, docx, gif, jpg, mpg, pdf, png, txt, zip, xls, 3gpp, mp2, mp3, wav, odt, ods, html, mp4, amr, apk, m4a, jpeg, aac
Restrictions: 50 per post, maximum total size 150000KB, maximum individual size 150000KB
Note that any files attached will not be displayed until approved by a moderator.
Anti-spam: complete the task

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: Dhammañāṇa
« on: January 08, 2020, 12:49:52 PM »

Touching lustful (enjoying bodily touch), even if with a corpse od a being ranges from dukkaṭa till sanghadisesa.

Doing favors by showing approve of certain relations or by being after affection, for gaining honor, acceptence and livelihood, lies in the area of Sanghadisesa 13, corrupting families.

Sharing gifts, given in faith, to people outside (aside of allowed), is in the area of dukkaṭa but can reach also till Sanghadisesa 13.

Watching and being amused on animals behaviour is a break of Brahmacariya.

Paying respect in many ways toward animals is a dukkaṭa and can lead till Sg 13 again.

Living with non Bhikkhus under one roof, especially with female, can lead till serious transgressions.

And that the case of such relation does not even end with repairable transgressions, but also can lead to be outside for a livetime shows the 1. downfall rule, as it has been also at the Buddhas times that certain relations gained a pick whish becomes a serious matter of the world.

Even in regard of the 4. downfall rule, it does matter. Just thing on how many Noble Ones suggestions are presented by displaying the "Sages" in near and intimacy relation with animals.









to display just some popular teachers in modern world. Actually the is not really one tradition which doesn't use this way of corrupt trade and it's surely not needed to desplay and point on more details... or speaking on even farming like extrems, keeping even tigers and efephants for trade and affections, livelihood.

That have been Vinaya aspects. My person guesses that there is no need, even no ways, that the matter in regard of highered virtue, mind, knowledge is cristal clear, and those inthe sphere know, while those still outside have "just" Vinaya to relay on, not aware of mental qualities.
Posted by: Dhammañāṇa
« on: January 05, 2020, 09:50:39 AM »

How could they?

Why would they?

As for keeping pets for profit they are not given to raise pets for such. That's even not proper for a lay person wishing for Brahmacariya and Uposatha Sila.

As for feeding intentional and personal pets with alms, monks are not even allowed to give to lay people.

Why would they? They do out of affection, lust and in association with low.

If seeing a monk keeping pets, such is lower as to keep children, such is lower as to share the gifts out of faith to ordinary people, such is given alms dedicated to Noble Ones to beings without virtue intentionally.

If seeing a monk stroke pets or enjoying touch of pets, or delight in the behavior of pets, be sure that he is far from Brahmacariya. He simple feeds for some degrees of lust and sex.

And having done so, who cares of the animal when he walks on? Or how could he walk on, if he is by defilement bound to care?

People living in association with pets, while avoiding humans, are known that they have grave social disorders. It's just another sexual, lust, perversion.

And if not falling into the told, they keep pets to make lay-people a favor and cause affection, are on the road of corrupting families and to be seen near Sanghadisesa 13.

And if having even ideas of "my pet" they are simple blind fools.

As for association: It's not to be expected, that one who associate with animals has good ways to grow in Sila, generosity, concentration and wisdom.

Equal meets each other again and again, tend to each other again and again, and nourishes each other.

See also: Association with pets - Associated rebith?

Btw.: association and living, and keeping and feeding people in Dhammic centers who are not capable to grow in Dhamma (without Sila, Dana,...), isn't different to someone feeding and keeping pets. It's simply desire for sensuality and becoming and Abrahmacariya that drives one to be a pet keeper monk. For his gains and to nourish on them, having feed them and make them dependent on one.