Post reply

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Tags:

Seperate each tag by a comma
Message icon:

Attach:
(Clear Attachment)
(more attachments)
Allowed file types: apk, doc, docx, gif, jpg, mpg, pdf, png, txt, zip, xls, 3gpp, mp2, mp3, wav, odt, ods, html, mp4, amr, apk, m4a, jpeg, aac
Restrictions: 50 per post, maximum total size 150000KB, maximum individual size 150000KB
Note that any files attached will not be displayed until approved by a moderator.
Anti-spam: complete the task

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: Dhammañāṇa
« on: September 30, 2018, 06:23:15 PM »

* Johann Bhante Pesala has no joy if copy his accumulated on other places. And he would not have much joy if seeing it even here...



© You may print any of these books for your own use. However, all rights are reserved. You may not use any of the site content on your own website, nor for commercial distribution. To publish the books, permission must be sought from the appropriate copyright owners. If you post an extract on a forum, post a link to the appropriate page....

Most teachings of Ven. Ledi Sayādaw are great, but when it comes to issuse of Sakaya diṭṭhi issues (nation, religion, race...), there is much bias, discrimination latent aversion.

My person is no "friend" of the householder's-Vipassana-movement.

Householder depend on certain livelihood and they need or like to have that what they regard as there own under controll. Control making merits, control further shares.

But it's possible to visit Bhante in his household . He normaly would not deny access for householders, devoted but prefers to dwell seclude from his actual family.

He has much Saddha in regard of literary teachings and classical Theravada, knows a lot but might be not so supportive in regard of Silas, silas beyond someone seeing maintaining housholds necessary. So with much But's and commentary and aimwell often higher then them. (desire fruits more then giving into simply focus on cause.
Posted by: gus
« on: September 30, 2018, 08:04:23 AM »

As the Sayādaw says, “If a monk, who is well-trained in the Vinaya, accumulates many followers and great material wealth, he can do much damage to the Buddha dispensation, unlike an ignorant monk.” So books like this are vital.

In the absence of the Buddha, maintaining acceptable standards of conduct for monks is hard, even if there is wide agreement on what acceptable standards are. The monks most in need of restraint are those least amenable to advice. At the first Buddhist Council, even five hundred Arahants could not agree on which offences were lesser and minor (Vin. ii. 288). The Milindapañha says that offences of wrong doing (dukkaṭa) and wrong speech (dubhāsita) are lesser and minor offences. This is reasonable since offences requiring confession (pācittiya), or confession with forfeiture (nissaggiyā pācittiya) include: killing animals, drinking intoxicants, telling deliberate lies, abusing monks, hitting monks, eating in the afternoon, and using money. All these things are contrary to the precepts observed by lay people or novices. So we cannot regard them as minor, except in comparison to the major offences such as sexual misconduct, stealing, or killing human beings. We could regard telling jokes, making sarcastic remarks, or talking with the mouth full while eating as minor offences, but scrupulous monks will observe even these minor rules out of respect for the Buddha.