Post reply

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Tags:

Seperate each tag by a comma
Message icon:

Attach:
(Clear Attachment)
(more attachments)
Allowed file types: apk, doc, docx, gif, jpg, mpg, pdf, png, txt, zip, xls, 3gpp, mp2, mp3, wav, odt, ods, html, mp4, amr, apk, m4a, jpeg
Restrictions: 50 per post, maximum total size 150000KB, maximum individual size 150000KB
Note that any files attached will not be displayed until approved by a moderator.
Anti-spam: complete the task

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: Johann
« on: November 16, 2019, 06:39:00 AM »

May person thinks define is somehow the way to try to get out the substance, the heardwood of something, and to peel away the unrelated. Un-fine would be cover things with a known gross appearance, color.

What does one think: Is the way to ake thinks more clear to try to unfine or define them?

Is vipassana a way of de-perception ? Is samadhi a way of "percepting"? Putting on a color or remove for clearancy and release?

What the function, good used, of satī and use of sañña here?