Posted by: Dhammañāṇa
« on: January 11, 2023, 08:25:43 AM »Venerable Bhikkhu Anon ,
as more near of possibility to put it into accessible format, my person took some view on the sources as well as Bhantes understanding of "taking what's not" given. Certain doubt has arosen, since most secondary material comes, possible without knowing by the original "thieves" from the "Robin hood camps".
My person is not sure whether it can be repared, possible forfeit and confessed, if the impression of improper ways may turn out right.
Maybe Bhante can clarify the issue, so that improper ways might end right here and by this way merits.
It's therefore that rules on how to transmit Vinaya are even more refined, requiring not only pure letters but also pure attained and a pure gathering, conductor.
as more near of possibility to put it into accessible format, my person took some view on the sources as well as Bhantes understanding of "taking what's not" given. Certain doubt has arosen, since most secondary material comes, possible without knowing by the original "thieves" from the "Robin hood camps".
My person is not sure whether it can be repared, possible forfeit and confessed, if the impression of improper ways may turn out right.
Maybe Bhante can clarify the issue, so that improper ways might end right here and by this way merits.
It's therefore that rules on how to transmit Vinaya are even more refined, requiring not only pure letters but also pure attained and a pure gathering, conductor.